 We are located in Canada
Call: (250) 752-2907
Email:
Fax:- (250) 594-1969

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

|

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
 |

|

|
|
|
|
Harr's Mighty
Mouse
Mouse is sort of our mascot, he is out of one of our first litters
born many years ago.
Mouse will always remain on our main page and in our hearts.
Hi!
My name is Mouse and I am only eight weeks old. I come from a very
loving environment. I was born in my breeder's kitchen and was
raised right in her home with my brothers and sisters. My breeder
made sure I got a good home with people who really wanted me, who
had a safe fenced play area for me and did not leave me alone all
day every day. I had all the vaccines required for my age, was de-wormed twice, had my poor tail docked and my
dew claws removed at 3 days old and was examined by a vet at least
twice before I was allowed to go to my new home. I tell you that
was a lot of stuff for a little guy. My breeder wanted to
make sure that all was well with me and that I didn't need any
special treatment or have any problems or defects. I guess she
knew what she was doing because I have great people who love me
and take care of me. I may be little but I am very mighty, happy
and healthy. |
|

The Right to
Breed
The state that has
no business in the
bedrooms of the
nation seeks to
insert itself into
the fallopian tubes
of its poodles.
Catherine McMillan,
National Post
Published: Thursday,
December 17, 2009
I still recall my first visit to the Small Animal
Clinic at the
Western College
of Veterinary
Medicine in
Saskatoon. As
the young
resident took
down my puppy's
health history,
she advised that
if I spayed my
little dog
before her first
heat cycle, the
risk of mammary
cancer could be
eliminated.
"Good to know,"
I replied. "But
how will that
affect her
future as my
foundation
bitch?"
Some 25-plus
years later, "Peras"
has hundreds of
champion
descendants
across six
continents,
while I am quite
likely the first
and only
commercial
artist to
co-author a
peer-reviewed
paper for the
American Journal
of Veterinary
Ophthalmology.
That young
resident's words
were a warning,
though I didn't
know it at the
time. Veterinary
medicine, once
an equal partner
with breeders,
sporstmen, and
food producers,
is being
transformed by
an activist
viewpoint that
reduces owners
to "guardians"
and elevates
health providers
to the
self-appointed
role of animal
"advocate."
"Spay and
neuter" has
achieved cult
mantra. Dog
breeders are
held in
suspicion: The
only good dog is
the "natural"
one. Defects are
blamed on breed
standards,
despite the fact
that the
majority of
purebreds are
produced by
family pets and
commercial
breeders, their
puppies as far
removed from the
show ring as a
second-hand
pickup from the
Formula One
track.
This attitude is
reflected by
provincial
boards that
recently have
moved to impose
bans on ear
cropping and
tail docking.
Though long the
subject of some
controversy,
these procedures
serve both
aesthetic and
practical ends,
injury
prevention and
hygiene among
them.
This current
turf war over
puppy tails is
just a preview
of coming
attractions. The
state that has
no business in
the bedrooms of
the nation seeks
to insert itself
into the
fallopian tubes
of its poodles.
A Canadian
Kennel Club (CKC)
director
recently
recounted the
hostile
atmosphere at a
recent meeting
with the
Canadian
Veterinary
Medical
Association (CVMA):
"These vets are
not only
speaking of
cropping and
docking.
Several, led by
New Brunswick,
are openly
critical of the
CKC's breed
standards, feel
that breeders
are poorly
educated with
respect to
health, genetics
and breeding
practices to
support an
animal's welfare
and are
censorious of
breeders -- in
particular those
breeders who
breed
conformation
dogs for show.
They are
criticizing our
standards for
individual
breeds and are
of the opinion
that we are not
supporting the
puppy purchasers
with healthy
dogs."
To achieve this,
they hint at
legislation.
After all, who
better to
condemn the
docking of a
puppy's tail
than the person
who will, in a
few weeks time,
slice open her
abdomen to
remove a healthy
uterus? Who
better to seek
criminalization
of ear cropping
than a
profession that
declaws kittens
for profit?
For as often as
they're
consulted by
media and policy
makers on
matters canine,
a veterinarian
receives no
training in
basic breed
identification,
much less the
diverse origins
and forces that
shape gene
pools. It's
unreasonable to
expect them to
-- it takes a
lifetime of
study to master
a single breed,
much less
hundreds.
The film
Best in Show
presented
the dog-show
circuit as a
caravan of
loopy
narcissists.
Omitted from
the script
were the
contributions
of the fancy
to everyday
canine
society --
rescue
efforts,
training
classes,
consumer
advice, the
millions
raised, the
efforts
donated to
health
research.
There is no
profit in
showing
dogs, for
costs
quickly
negate the
returns.
It's an
esoteric
pursuit,
driven by
love of
breed,
competitive
reward, and
that
appreciation
of form and
symmetry
shared by
all artists,
a thing we
know as
"beauty."
The
Doberman's
"look of
eagles," the
merle
collie's
loud and
luxurious
coat, the
silhouette
of the
Skipperke --
those things
that fill
the eye can
determine
the fate of
breeds, for
it is their
beauty that
so often
attracts and
inspires
human beings
to devote
resources to
their
perpetuation.
The distance
between a
breed and
extinction
is five
years, for
this is the
average
reproductive
lifespan of
a female.
For rare
breeds and
those with
limited
genetic
diversity,
it takes
only one
ill-conceived
edict on the
part of
policy
makers to
start it
down the
road to
collapse.
It seems
like a small
thing, this
battle for a
veterinarian's
liberty to
practice as
he sees fit,
a dog
breeder's
quest for
perfection.
After all,
no one needs
to crop ears
on a Boxer.
But then
again, no
one needs a
Boxer at
all, or any
sort of pet.
Purebreds
(of all
species)
carry health
risks
derived from
their
genetic
founding
fathers.
Breeds
weren't
created to
compile
longevity
records, but
to perform
tasks for
mankind --
to dispatch
vermin,
predators,
and enemy
barbarians,
locate game,
retrieve
over water,
to pull
sleds, or
warm a
dowager's
bed on a
cold winter
night. And
so, they
remain
imperfect.
The Borzoi
is living
history of
czarist
Russia, the
giant
Mastiff a
modern echo
of ancient
Rome -- but
they suffer
high rates
of bloat.
Poster
artists
recruited
the English
bulldog as a
symbol of
resolve in
World War
II, but the
massive head
that
encouraged a
nation
results in
caesarian
sections.
The
Dalmatian's
spots are
beloved of
Disney and
children
everywhere,
but the
genetics
that create
them can
result in
deafness.
The merry
spaniel can
wag an
undocked
tail to
bloody pulp,
but no one
hunts
woodcock in
these parts.
Better no
cocker, they
say, than no
tail.
Like so many
other small
things in
this brave
new humane
world --
history,
property
rights,
individual
liberty, and
the
beholder's
permission
to declare
something
"beautiful"
-- the
eradication
of the
purebred dog
is underway,
aided and
abetted by
those we
once
considered
friends. And
yet, to this
breeder at
least, so
seldom has
one small
thing
carried with
it such
symbolism
for what it
is we are
allowing
them to
destroy.
There is an
air of
nihilism in
what they
do. Like
"green"
zealots who
insist
millions
will die
from climate
change
unless we
reduce the
earth's
population
by billions,
their
ideological
sisters in
veterinary
activism
would solve
the problems
of purebred
dogs by
eliminating
them
altogether.
They seem
oddly
disconnected
from the
reality that
for
veterinary
medicine to
survive, the
patient must
reproduce.
- Catherine
McMillan
lives in
Saskatchewan
and runs the
blog "Small
Dead
Animals." In
2009,
Miniature
Schnauzers
descending
from her
"Minuteman"
kennel line
include
those ranked
#1 in the
breed in the
USA, Canada,
Brazil and
England,
along with
the #2 MS in
Australia
and the Jr.
World Winner
at the World
Show in
Slovakia.
Catherine
McMillan,
National Post
Published: Thursday,
December 17,
2009

|
http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/Articles/LegislativeUpdate06012009
You can't really ban a
word. In fact, an attempt to ban something often backfires, particularly
in the United States, where we don't like people censoring our speech. So
I'm not going to tell you not to say "puppy mill". I'm going to give you
some very good reasons for not using that phrase. I speak to a lot of dog
clubs and frequently hear dog breeders supporting so-called
"anti-puppy-mill" laws. When I ask these people to define "puppy mill,"
invariably the definitions given include:
* People who "over breed" their dogs;
* People who don't take care of their dogs;
* People who have too many dogs;
* People who breed dogs "just for money"; and
* People who don't take health issues into account when breeding their
dogs".
Let's look at these
definitions in turn. What is "over breeding" ? In the wild, most canids can
only reproduce once a year. Most domestic dogs can have two litters a
year. When I first became a dog breeder, it was almost a religious belief
that no female dog should be bred more than once a year. We were told that
it was important to "rest" the uterus between litters. Today, however,
thanks to advances in veterinary medicine, we know that an uterus is
actually damaged by the elevated progesterone levels that occur in each
heat cycle, whether the dog is pregnant or not. Veterinary reproduction
specialists recommend that dogs be bred on their second or third heat
cycle, that we do more back-to-back breedings, and that we spay the dogs
at around age six.
The "over breeding"
argument also treats reproduction as something that female dogs wouldn't
do if they had a choice. Dogs aren't people - female dogs actually want to
be bred when they're in heat and, with few exceptions, enjoy raising their
puppies. It's not an unwelcome event for dogs. People who don't take care
of their dogs are already guilty of a crime in all 50 states. There is
nowhere in the United States where it is legal to neglect or abuse dogs.
Sadly, a small minority of all dog breeders - commercial, home and hobby -
commit neglect and abuse. Some of these do so out of ignorance, some out
of laziness, and some out of meanness. All are already breaking the law.
It just needs to be enforced.
One of our biggest
problems now is that animal radicals insist that every dog be raised like
a hothouse flower. One bill proposed this year would have required every
kennel to be air conditioned. Many owners of working dogs prefer that
their dogs be acclimated to hot weather so that they can work when the
temperature goes up. Likewise, sled dogs in the north often sleep outdoors
in the snow. Dogs can live and thrive in a wide range of environments. The
Arctic Circle, the jungles of Africa, and the deserts of Arabia have all
produced breeds of dogs that can live happily in conditions that might not
suit all dogs. It is important that we not let activists redefine the
needs of dogs to the extent that we are forced to provide a brass bed and
a down pillow for every animal in the kennel!
What is "too many" dogs?
Most of our breeds were developed by wealthy people who kept large numbers
of dogs. Hound breeders traditionally kept good-sized packs, and early
show breeders did as well. Now that our sport includes more mainstream
people - people with jobs or people who need jobs - it's hard for many of
us to keep large numbers of dogs. There is no inherent link between
numbers of dogs and neglect. People who have the resources to keep big
kennels provide a service for all of us, particularly if they maintain a
good number of useful stud dogs.
Breeding dogs is
expensive, and getting more so daily. It's just plain silly to pretend
that none of us needs the money generated by puppy sales and stud
services. Without that income, the vast majority of middle class breeders
could not afford this sport. When our sport was solely in the hands of
rich people, it was the norm to sneer at people in "trade", and part of
that attitude was handed down to us with the culture of our sport. Today,
however, the majority of us in the sport are "in trade", in the sense that
we have to work to support ourselves. Our dogs must, at least in part,
support themselves or most of us would have to get out of the game.
We have among us a small
but vociferous group of people who think that breeders only care about
producing great hunting or show dogs, and nothing about health. In fact,
I've never met a breeder who wasn't concerned about the health of his dogs
and the health of his breed. Most health problems in dogs don't have
simple solutions, so it is only natural that breeders are often going to
disagree about how to address health problems. When there's no right
answer to a question, then breeders who follow a different path than you
might choose are not necessarily wrong or unconcerned. I know that many
believe that commercial breeders don't care about health, but the fact is
that their professional organizations provide some of the most
sophisticated health seminars in the country for their breeders.
Twenty years ago, animal
activists created the phrase "puppy mill". Back then, it was only applied
to commercial breeders, and then only to those who were breaking the law
by neglecting their dogs. In a futile attempt to placate activists, many
hobby breeders adopted the term "puppy mill" and used it to separate
"them" from "us". It was a mistake then, and it's rapidly becoming fatal
today. Every one of these so-called "anti-puppy-mill bills" has a
definition that could easily include breeders of hunting and show dogs.
Every time you use that phrase, you're contributing to the idea that dog
breeders need to be regulated out of existence.
The message we need to
send to America is that purebred dogs are good, not just because they have
pedigrees, but because of their predictability, and that people should
shop at least as carefully for a puppy as they do for a car. We don't need
to help the animal radicals spread their message by using their favorite
term: puppy mill.
LINKS
www.doglegislationcouncilcanada.org
http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/breederinfo11.htm
http://www.americanssupportinganimalownership.com/
Animal Rights.html
http://www.hsussucks.com/
http://www.prestigestandardpoodles.com/breedersarticle.htm
http://www.txfb.org/newsmanager/templates/TXFBTemplate.aspx?articleid=5569&zoneid=113
WSPA is affliated with the H$U$ :
http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm?oid=136
|